KUNST
SCHÖNHEIT & WELLNESS
HANDWERK
KULTUR & GESCHICHTE
UNTERHALTUNG
UMFELD
ESSEN & GETRÄNKE
REVERSE ENGINEERING
WISSENSCHAFTEN
SPORT
TECHNOLOGIE
WEARABLES
Caesar Cipher
Pixel

Erstellt von

Pixel

20. August 2026FI
0
0
0
0
0

Caesar Cipher

Shift every letter three places along the alphabet and A becomes D, B becomes E, and the message becomes unreadable to anyone who does not know to shift it back. Suetonius records Julius Caesar using exactly this. It is the simplest substitution cipher there is, and it survived for centuries not because it was strong but because most people could not read at all — the cipher was protecting against the literate few rather than against analysis. It is completely broken by two separate attacks, and building both of them is more instructive than building the cipher: there are only 25 possible keys to try, and even without trying any of them, the letter frequencies give the answer away.
Anfänger
45 minutes

Anweisungen

1

Build a shift strip and encrypt

Two alphabets, one sliding against the other.

  1. Write the alphabet along a strip of card.
  2. Write it twice, end to end, on a second strip.
  3. Slide the second strip three places and read off the pairs.
Sliding rather than looking up prevents the commonest error, which is forgetting to wrap around from Z back to A. The device makes the modular arithmetic automatic — and this is modular arithmetic, working modulo 26.

Materialien für diesen Schritt:

Card Stock (Heavy, 50 Sheets)Card Stock (Heavy, 50 Sheets)1 Packung
Graphite Pencil SetGraphite Pencil Set1 Set
2

Break it by brute force

The first attack needs no cleverness at all.

  1. Take a ciphertext with an unknown shift.
  2. Write out all 25 possible decryptions.
  3. One will be English.
Time it. Twenty-five options is a key space you can exhaust by hand over a cup of tea. This is why key SIZE matters as an independent property from cleverness — a brilliant cipher with 25 keys is a broken cipher.
3

Break it by frequency, without trying any key

The second attack works even when brute force would not.

  1. Tally letter frequencies in a long ciphertext and draw a bar chart.
  2. Compare with English frequencies — E is commonest, then T, A, O, I, N.
  3. Measure the distance from the ciphertext's tallest bar to E's position.
That distance IS the key. The whole frequency profile has simply slid along by the shift amount, so the shape is unchanged and its offset betrays everything. Note this scales: it works just as well against a cipher with a million keys, because it does not try keys at all.

Materialien für diesen Schritt:

Graph PaperGraph Paper1 pad
4

Try to fix it, and fail informatively

Upgrade to a random alphabet and see what survives.

  1. Replace the shift with a fully scrambled substitution alphabet.
  2. Count the key space — 26 factorial, around 4 × 10²⁶.
  3. Now run the frequency attack again on a long message.
It still breaks. The key space is astronomically larger and brute force is hopeless, but each letter still maps to exactly one other letter, so the frequency profile is merely shuffled rather than flattened. Adding keys does not help when the weakness is structural — which is exactly the problem the Vigenère cipher was invented to solve.
5

History and context

Suetonius describes Caesar's use of a shift of three in military correspondence, and Aulus Gellius mentions it too. It was adequate in a world where interception was rare and readers rarer.

Frequency analysis is the important invention, not the cipher. The Arab polymath al-Kindi described it in Baghdad in the ninth century, in a manuscript on deciphering cryptographic messages — the earliest known account. It emerged from scholarship on the Qur'an, where counting letter and word frequencies was already an established method. Cryptanalysis therefore begins as a by-product of textual scholarship, and Europe did not catch up for six hundred years.

ROT13 is a Caesar cipher with a shift of 13, still used online — not for secrecy but to hide spoilers and punchlines from casual view. Because 13 is half of 26, encrypting twice returns the original, which makes it its own inverse. It is honest about being a courtesy rather than a protection.

What this teaches for the rest of cryptography: two independent properties matter, and they are not the same. A cipher must have a key space too large to search, AND it must destroy the statistical structure of the plaintext. Caesar fails both. A random substitution alphabet fixes the first and not the second, which is why it also falls.

Materialien

3

Verwandte Blueprints

Diese Blueprints teilen Wissen — Techniken, Materialien oder Prinzipien

CC0 Gemeinfrei

Dieser Blueprint ist unter CC0 veröffentlicht. Sie dürfen dieses Werk für jeden Zweck frei kopieren, ändern, verbreiten und verwenden, ohne um Erlaubnis zu fragen.

Unterstützen Sie den Maker, indem Sie Produkte über seinen Blueprint kaufen, wo er eine Maker-Provision von Anbietern festgelegt, verdient. Oder erstellen Sie eine neue Iteration dieses Blueprints und verbinden Sie ihn in Ihrem eigenen Blueprint, um Einnahmen zu teilen.

Diskussion

(0)

Anmelden um an der Diskussion teilzunehmen

Kommentare werden geladen...