NGHỆ THUẬT
LÀM ĐẸP VÀ SỨC KHỎE
THỦ CÔNG
VĂN HÓA VÀ LỊCH SỬ
GIẢI TRÍ
MÔI TRƯỜNG
THỰC PHẨM VÀ ĐỒ UỐNG
KỸ THUẬT NGƯỢC
KHOA HỌC
THỂ THAO
CÔNG NGHỆ
THIẾT BỊ ĐEO
Mark and Recapture: Counting Animals You Cannot See at Once
A quadrat works because plants stay put. Animals move, hide and flee, so you can never see all of them at once — and counting the ones you do see tells you more about your own searching than about the population.
Pierre-Simon Laplace used the idea to estimate the population of France in 1802, and C. G. Johannes Petersen applied it to fish in 1896. Catch a sample, mark them, release them, wait, catch a second sample. If a tenth of the second catch carries marks, then your marked animals are about a tenth of the population — so the population is about ten times the number you marked.
The arithmetic is trivial. The assumptions are not, and every one of them can be violated in a way that makes the answer confidently wrong. Most of this blueprint is about those assumptions, because that is where the real work is.
Trung cấp
3 days
Hướng dẫn
1
1
Choose a species and a mark that does no harm
Choose a species and a mark that does no harm
Woodlice, snails and ground beetles are ideal: abundant, harmless, easy to catch and easy to mark. Use a tiny dot of non-toxic paint or correction fluid on a hard shell or elytron, never on soft skin, and never anywhere that impedes movement.
The mark must not make the animal more visible to predators, heavier, or less able to hide — if it does, marked animals die faster and your estimate inflates. Work quickly, keep animals cool and shaded, and release them exactly where they were found.
Vật liệu cho bước này:
Lọ thuỷ tinh6 cái
Bút dạ không xoá1 cáiCông cụ cần thiết:
Nhíp
Kính lúp
Găng tay nitrile2
2
Define the area, and keep it the same
Define the area, and keep it the same
Mark out a fixed study area and search it the same way, for the same length of time, on both occasions.
The method estimates the population of an AREA, and if the second search covers more ground or more time than the first, the comparison is broken. Searching under exactly the same set of logs and stones both times is the easiest way to keep effort constant — and note that it also makes the animals living under those logs more likely to be caught twice, which is the next problem.
Vật liệu cho bước này:
Cọc gỗ4 cáiCông cụ cần thiết:
Thước dây cuộn
Đồng hồ bấm giờ3
3
Leave a gap: long enough to mix, short enough to matter
Leave a gap: long enough to mix, short enough to matter
Release the marked animals and wait — usually a day or two for invertebrates — before the second sample.
Too short and the marked animals have not mixed back into the population, so you recapture them near where you released them and over-count the marked fraction, which UNDER-estimates the population. Too long and animals are born, die or wander out, which breaks the assumption that the population is closed. That tension has no perfect answer and choosing the gap thoughtfully is the skill.
Công cụ cần thiết:
Sổ ghi thực địa4
4
Take the second sample without favouring marked animals
Take the second sample without favouring marked animals
Search as before and record how many you caught in total and how many of those carry marks.
The subtle trap is your own eye: once you know what a marked woodlouse looks like, you spot them more readily, and every extra one you notice pushes the estimate down. Collect everything into a container FIRST and only inspect for marks afterwards, indoors, one at a time. That one change removes the bias entirely.
Vật liệu cho bước này:
Lọ thuỷ tinh6 cáiCông cụ cần thiết:
Kính lúpSổ ghi thực địa5
5
The estimate, the correction and the confidence interval
The estimate, the correction and the confidence interval
Đang tải sổ tay Jupyter…
Công cụ cần thiết:
Sổ ghi thực địa6
6
Release everything, and say what you assumed
Release everything, and say what you assumed
Return every animal to where it was caught, and write in your notes which assumptions you think held and which you doubt.
'Estimated 480, 95% interval 330 to 630, but the gap was only 24 hours so mixing may have been incomplete and the true figure is probably higher' is a useful result. A bare number is not. Stating your doubts is not weakness — it is the difference between a measurement and a claim.
Công cụ cần thiết:
Sổ ghi thực địaBlueprint liên quan
Các blueprint này chia sẻ kiến thức — kỹ thuật, vật liệu hoặc nguyên tắc
CC0 Phạm vi công cộng
Bản thiết kế này được phát hành theo CC0. Bạn tự do sao chép, sửa đổi, phân phối và sử dụng cho bất kỳ mục đích nào mà không cần xin phép.
Hỗ trợ nhà sáng tạo bằng cách mua sản phẩm qua bản thiết kế, nơi họ nhận Hoa hồng nhà sáng tạo do nhà bán hàng đặt, hoặc tạo phiên bản mới và kết nối trong bản thiết kế riêng để chia sẻ doanh thu.