ARTE
BELEZA E BEM-ESTAR
ARTESANATO
CULTURA E HISTÓRIA
ENTRETENIMENTO
MEIO AMBIENTE
COMIDA E BEBIDAS
ENGENHARIA REVERSA
CIÊNCIAS
ESPORTES
TECNOLOGIA
TECNOLOGIA VESTÍVEL
Differential Levelling: Carrying a Height Across a Site
Emma

Criado por

Emma

23. setembro 2026SE
26
0
0
0
0

Differential Levelling: Carrying a Height Across a Site

The water level carries a height beautifully and runs out of patience at about thirty metres. To take a height a kilometre, or up a hill, you need an instrument that defines a horizontal LINE OF SIGHT and a graduated staff to read against it. The arithmetic is deliberately simple, because it was designed to be done in the rain by someone who has been walking all day. Read the staff on a point of known height — that is a backsight — and add it to get the height of the instrument's line of sight. Read the staff on an unknown point — a foresight — and subtract it. That is the whole method, repeated. What makes it trustworthy is not the instrument. It is that the work closes: you finish back where you started, and the discrepancy tells you whether to believe any of it.
Intermediário
1 day

Instruções

1

Set the instrument up and make it truly level

Set the tripod firmly, tread the legs in, and level the instrument with its footscrews: align the bubble over two screws, centre it, turn ninety degrees, centre again, and repeat until it holds in every direction. Check it by rotating the instrument a full circle — the bubble must stay centred throughout. If it wanders, the instrument is not level and every reading from this setup is wrong by an amount that depends on which way you were pointing, which is the hardest kind of error to find afterwards.

Ferramentas necessárias:

Nível óptico (topografia)Nível óptico (topografia)
Tripé de câmaraTripé de câmara
2

Hold the staff plumb, and mean it

The staff must be vertical. Use a small circular bubble on the staff, or have the staffholder rock it slowly back and forth toward the instrument while the observer takes the MINIMUM reading. A leaning staff always reads too HIGH — never too low — because tilting moves the graduation the sight line crosses further up the staff. So this is a systematic error that biases everything one way. Rocking the staff and taking the minimum finds vertical geometrically, and it needs no bubble at all.

Ferramentas necessárias:

Mira de nivelamentoMira de nivelamento
3

Book it in a rise-and-fall table

Rule columns: point, backsight, intermediate, foresight, rise, fall, reduced level. Enter every reading as you take it, in ink, and never rewrite a figure — strike it through and write the correct one beside it. A rewritten figure is indistinguishable from a forged one, and the whole value of the record is that it can be checked later. The rise-and-fall form has a built-in arithmetic check the collimation form does not, which is why it is worth the extra column.
4

Keep the sights balanced

Set up so that the backsight and foresight distances are roughly EQUAL, and keep neither longer than about fifty metres. This is the most important habit in the whole method. Any collimation error — the line of sight not quite horizontal — adds a false amount proportional to distance. With equal sights the two false amounts are equal and CANCEL exactly when you subtract, so the instrument's largest defect disappears for free. Earth curvature and refraction cancel the same way.

Ferramentas necessárias:

Fita métricaFita métrica
5

Close the loop, and check the arithmetic

Finish by levelling back to your starting benchmark. Then check: the sum of the backsights minus the sum of the foresights must equal the sum of the rises minus the sum of the falls, and must equal the last reduced level minus the first. Those three quantities agreeing proves only that the ARITHMETIC is right — it says nothing about the readings. The closing error, the amount by which you fail to return to your benchmark, is the one that tells you about the work itself. Both checks are needed and they test different things.
6

Reducing the levels, and closing the error

A carregar o notebook Jupyter…
7

Find your instrument's collimation error once

Do a two-peg test. Set two pegs about fifty metres apart, level from exactly midway between them and record the difference; then move the instrument close behind one peg and read both again. From the middle, any collimation error cancels, so that difference is the TRUE one. From the end it does not cancel, so the discrepancy between the two results is the error over that distance. Knowing the number lets you judge how strictly you must balance your sights — and on a good instrument it is small enough that balanced sights make it irrelevant, which is the whole point of step 4.

Materiais para este passo:

Cavilhas de madeiraCavilhas de madeira4 peças

Ferramentas necessárias:

Nível óptico (topografia)Nível óptico (topografia)
Mira de nivelamentoMira de nivelamento
Fita métricaFita métrica

Materiais

1

Ferramentas necessárias

4

CC0 Domínio Público

Este blueprint é liberado sob CC0. Você é livre para copiar, modificar, distribuir e usar este trabalho para qualquer finalidade, sem pedir permissão.

Apoie o Maker comprando produtos através do Blueprint, onde ele ganha uma Comissão Maker definida pelos vendedores, ou crie uma nova versão deste Blueprint e inclua-o como conexão no seu próprio Blueprint para compartilhar receita.

Discussão

(0)

Entrar para participar da discussão

Carregando comentários...