IṢẸ́ ỌNÀ
ẸWÀ ÀTI ÌLERA
IṢẸ́ ỌWỌ́
ÀṢÀ ÀTI ÌTÀN
ÌṢERÉ
ÀYÍKÁ
OÚNJẸ ÀTI OHUN MÍMU
REVERSE ENGINEERING
SÁYẸ́ǸSÌ
ERÉ ÌDÁRAYÁ
ÌMỌ̀-Ẹ̀RỌ
ÀWỌN OHUN WÍWỌ̀
Breaking by Impact: The Swing Hammer and the Grate That Sets the Size
Martin

Ṣẹ́dá nipasẹ̀

Martin

27. Oṣù Kẹsàn 2026NO
2
0
0
0
0

Breaking by Impact: The Swing Hammer and the Grate That Sets the Size

A jaw and a gyratory both break stone the same way: they squeeze it slowly between two surfaces until it fails. There is another way entirely, and it suits a whole class of materials the squeezers handle badly. Hit it. A swing-hammer pulveriser spins a stack of discs carrying free-hanging hammers, and at three thousand revolutions a minute a half-metre rotor swings its hammer tips at about 285 km/h. Nothing is squeezed; everything is struck. Two things about the machine are not obvious. The hammers swing on pins instead of being bolted solid — for the same reason a jaw crusher has a sacrificial toggle. And the product size is not set by the hammers at all, but by the grate the material has to find its way through, which is also where the machine's power and its dust come from.
Ilọsíwájú
About 3 hours

Ìlànà

1

Break the same stone two ways and compare the pieces

Take two similar pieces of stone. Squeeze one slowly in the vise until it fails. Strike the other once, hard, with a ball peen hammer on an anvil or a steel plate. Spread both sets of fragments out and look at them. The squeezed stone tends to split along its weakest plane and give a few large, often slabby pieces. The struck stone shatters from the point of impact outward, and gives more pieces, more of them roughly equidimensional, and noticeably more dust. That difference is the whole reason both kinds of machine exist. Concrete aggregate wants cubes, so impact crushers are used to shape it. A hard abrasive ore wants compression, because impact hammers would be eaten alive. Soft, friable, damp or sticky feeds — coal, limestone, gypsum, clay, bark, grain — suit impact, because they break easily and they clog a squeezing machine. Eye protection, and mind where the fragments go. Struck stone travels.

Àwọn ohun èlò fún ìgbésẹ̀ yìí:

Òkúta àkójọÒkúta àkójọ2 ẹyọ
Kábónéètì Kalisiọ̀mù - Òkúta Ẹfun Fífọ́Kábónéètì Kalisiọ̀mù - Òkúta Ẹfun Fífọ́1 ẹyọ

Àwọn irinṣẹ́ tí a nílò:

Òòlù olórí bọ́ọ̀lùÒòlù olórí bọ́ọ̀lù
Ìdìmú TábìlìÌdìmú Tábìlì
Pẹpẹ irin rírọ̀Pẹpẹ irin rírọ̀
Òṣùwọ̀n Kálípà Díjítà Ìnṣì 6Òṣùwọ̀n Kálípà Díjítà Ìnṣì 6
Gílásì Ààbò Tí Ó Mọ́Gílásì Ààbò Tí Ó Mọ́
Ìbọ̀wọ́ Iṣẹ́ AwọÌbọ̀wọ́ Iṣẹ́ Awọ
2

Tip speed, and five tonnes pulling on a pin

Ń ṣí ìwé Jupyter…
3

Build a hammer assembly and balance it

You do not need a working mill to understand the rotor. Cut two discs from steel plate, drill matching holes on a bolt circle, and hang flat hammers between them on pins through those holes. Mount the pair on a shaft in bearings. Then **balance it**, and do it properly, because this is the part that hurts people. Weigh every hammer on the digital scale. Any hammer that differs from its opposite number leaves an out-of-balance mass turning at speed, and the force goes as the square of the speed exactly as it did in step 2. Match hammers in pairs and fit matched pairs diametrically opposite. Write the weights on them. Static-balance the assembly on two level knife edges: it should come to rest in any position rather than always settling with the same point down. Correct by removing metal, never by adding it in a way that can come off. **When hammers are replaced, they are replaced in matched sets, never singly.** A worn hammer is lighter than a new one, and one new hammer among nineteen worn ones is a bomb. This is the single most important sentence in the rung.

Àwọn ohun èlò fún ìgbésẹ̀ yìí:

Pẹpẹ irin rírọ̀Pẹpẹ irin rírọ̀2 ẹyọ
Ọ̀pá irin aiseỌ̀pá irin aise1 ẹyọ
Skurú ẹ̀rọSkurú ẹ̀rọ8 ẹyọ
Ìdìmú bearing (KP08)Ìdìmú bearing (KP08)2 ẹyọ

Àwọn irinṣẹ́ tí a nílò:

Ẹ̀rọ Ìlùkòkò AláìlókùnẸ̀rọ Ìlùkòkò Aláìlókùn
Àkójọ Orí ÌlùkòkòÀkójọ Orí Ìlùkòkò
Ẹ̀rọ ìlọ̀ onígunẸ̀rọ ìlọ̀ onígun
Ẹ̀rọ Ìdàpọ̀ Irin MIGẸ̀rọ Ìdàpọ̀ Irin MIG
Àṣíborí wẹ́là tí ó ń ṣú fúnra rẹ̀Àṣíborí wẹ́là tí ó ń ṣú fúnra rẹ̀
Òṣùwọ̀n DíjítàÒṣùwọ̀n Díjítà
Òṣùwọ̀n Kálípà Díjítà Ìnṣì 6Òṣùwọ̀n Kálípà Díjítà Ìnṣì 6
Ìwọ̀n Ìtẹ́júÌwọ̀n Ìtẹ́jú
Gílásì Ààbò Tí Ó Mọ́Gílásì Ààbò Tí Ó Mọ́
Ìbọ̀wọ́ Iṣẹ́ AwọÌbọ̀wọ́ Iṣẹ́ Awọ
Ààbò etíÀàbò etí
4

How the grate makes the product — and the dust

Ń ṣí ìwé Jupyter…
5

Feed rate, and the noise that tells you it is wrong

A hammer mill tells you how it is doing, audibly, and it is worth learning the sounds. **Starved** — a clear ringing, the motor barely loaded. Hammers are hitting the odd particle and mostly hitting air. The machine is wearing without producing, and the wear pattern it develops running empty is not the one it develops running loaded. **Loaded correctly** — a steady roar, the note constant, the motor's current steady. **Overfed** — the note drops and drags, the motor current climbs, and the product coarsens, because material is being pushed through the grate before it has been hit enough times. An overfed hammer mill will eventually choke and stall, and restarting a mill full of material is how shafts get bent. Feed it steadily. This is exactly what the last rung of this batch is about: a steady feed does not come from a hopper with a hole in it, it comes from a feeder. And never open one until the rotor has stopped. A hammer rotor carries an enormous amount of stored energy and coasts for minutes after the power is off, silently.

Àwọn ohun èlò fún ìgbésẹ̀ yìí:

Kábónéètì Kalisiọ̀mù - Òkúta Ẹfun Fífọ́Kábónéètì Kalisiọ̀mù - Òkúta Ẹfun Fífọ́1 bucket

Àwọn irinṣẹ́ tí a nílò:

Aago ÌdúróAago Ìdúró
Òṣùwọ̀n DíjítàÒṣùwọ̀n Díjítà
Ìwọ̀n Ìyípo DígítàÌwọ̀n Ìyípo Dígítà
Ààbò etíÀàbò etí
Ìbòjú ErukuÌbòjú Eruku
Gílásì Ààbò Tí Ó Mọ́Gílásì Ààbò Tí Ó Mọ́
Ìbọ̀wọ́ Iṣẹ́ AwọÌbọ̀wọ́ Iṣẹ́ Awọ
6

History and context

**US 1,041,495, 'Pulverizer', William K. Liggett and Walter J. Armstrong of Columbus, Ohio, application filed 23 January 1909, granted 15 October 1912.** The specification's own opening line is exact about what it is: *'This invention relates to pulverizers of the swing hammer type, and has as its object the provision of an improved hammer mechanism which will be efficient to grind the material and possess great wearing qualities.'* The claim is about the hammer mechanism itself — keyed end plates and a series of perforated disk plates carrying the hammer pins — and about keeping the dust inside, which the patent mentions in the same breath. Both concerns date the machine precisely: by 1909 the swing hammer was established, and what was being competed on was how long the hammers lasted and whether the room filled with dust. **Honest limits.** Impact is wrong for hard abrasive rock: the hammers wear out faster than they pay for themselves, and a quartzite feed will destroy a set in hours. It makes fines whether you want them or not, and the finer the grate the more of them. It is the dustiest machine in this batch by a wide margin, and the dust from many feeds is an explosion hazard as well as a health one — grain, coal, sugar and aluminium dusts have all detonated in mills. It is loud in a way that damages hearing in minutes, not hours. And it is unforgiving of tramp metal in a way the swinging hammers only partly mitigate: fit a magnet upstream and use it.

Àwọn ohun-èlò

6

Àwọn irinṣẹ́ tó nílò

17

CC0 Àgbègbè Gbogbogbò

Blueprint yìí ti jáde lábẹ́ CC0. O lè ṣe àdàkọ, yí padà, pín, àti lò láìsí ìyọ̀ǹda.

Ṣàtìlẹ́yìn Olùṣẹ́dá nípa rírà àwọn ọjà nipasẹ̀ Blueprint wọn Ẹ̀san Olùṣẹ́dá tí àwọn Olùtajà gbé kalẹ̀, tàbí ṣẹ̀dá àtúnṣe tuntun ti Blueprint yìí kí o sì fi sínú Blueprint rẹ gẹ́gẹ́ bí ìsopọ̀ láti pín owó-wíwọlé.

Ìfọ̀rọ̀wérọ̀

(0)

Wọlé láti dara pọ̀ mọ́ ìfọ̀rọ̀wérọ̀

Ń gbé àwọn ọ̀rọ̀ wọlé...