IṢẸ́ ỌNÀ
ẸWÀ ÀTI ÌLERA
IṢẸ́ ỌWỌ́
ÀṢÀ ÀTI ÌTÀN
ÌṢERÉ
ÀYÍKÁ
OÚNJẸ ÀTI OHUN MÍMU
REVERSE ENGINEERING
SÁYẸ́ǸSÌ
ERÉ ÌDÁRAYÁ
ÌMỌ̀-Ẹ̀RỌ
ÀWỌN OHUN WÍWỌ̀
The Betz Limit: Why No Rotor Takes More Than 16/27 of the Wind
Youblob (generated from this blueprint's notebook) · CC0
Volt

Ṣẹ́dá nipasẹ̀

Volt

27. Oṣù Kẹsàn 2026SE
13
0
0
0
0

The Betz Limit: Why No Rotor Takes More Than 16/27 of the Wind

A wind rotor makes power by slowing the wind. Slow it too little and most of the energy blows through; slow it too much and the air piles up and goes round the rotor instead of through it. Between the two lies a best amount, and it caps every rotor that has ever been built at 16/27 — 59.3 % — of the power in the wind. Albert Betz published the result in 1919–20; Frederick Lanchester and Nikolai Zhukovsky reached it independently, and it is sometimes given all three names. This practice rung derives the limit in a notebook and uses it to rate the small rotor built in the first rung of this batch.
Olùbẹ̀rẹ̀
About 2 hours

Ìlànà

1

Derive the limit

Ń ṣí ìwé Jupyter…
2

See the slowed wake

Set the rung-1 rotor in front of the box fan and hold a smouldering incense stick just upstream of the rotor disc, then just downstream, and watch the smoke. Measure the wind speed with the anemometer a rotor diameter in front, and a rotor diameter behind — with the rotor loaded, and then with the load disconnected so it free-wheels. The loaded rotor leaves a slower wake than the free-wheeling one: slowing the air is where the power comes from. The notebook says the best wake is one third of the incoming wind; see how close your rotor's gets.

Àwọn ohun èlò fún ìgbésẹ̀ yìí:

Ọ̀pá tùràrí fún ríri èéfínỌ̀pá tùràrí fún ríri èéfín2 ẹyọ

Àwọn irinṣẹ́ tí a nílò:

Àbẹ̀bẹ̀ àpótí (ìwọ̀n tí ó ń yípadà)Àbẹ̀bẹ̀ àpótí (ìwọ̀n tí ó ń yípadà)
Òǹwọ̀n atẹ́gùn olówọ́Òǹwọ̀n atẹ́gùn olówọ́
Okùn Ìdíwọ̀nOkùn Ìdíwọ̀n
3

Rate your rotor against Betz

From the first rung's measurements, take the electrical power at one wind speed. Divide it by the wind power through your rotor's disc at that speed (the notebook prints it): that is your Cp. Divide again by 0.593 to see what fraction of the theoretical best you reached. Expect a small printed rotor on a hobby motor to reach only a fraction of the Betz limit: the motor's own losses, the blade drag at low Reynolds number and the tip losses all take their share. That gap is what a century of blade design has closed.

Àwọn irinṣẹ́ tí a nílò:

Òǹwọ̀n iná mànàmáná onírúurúÒǹwọ̀n iná mànàmáná onírúurú
Òǹwọ̀n atẹ́gùn olówọ́Òǹwọ̀n atẹ́gùn olówọ́
4

Context

**Albert Betz**, Göttingen, published the limit in 1919–20. It uses nothing but conservation of mass, momentum and energy through an idealised disc, which is why it applies to every kind of rotor — Savonius, Darrieus and propeller alike (the next two rungs). It is a practice rung: no patent anchors it. **Honest limits of the model.** It ignores the swirl a rotor leaves behind, blade drag and tip losses — all of which lower the real figure further. It applies to an open rotor in a free stream; a rotor in a duct or a pipe (the Kaplan turbine) is a different problem.

Àwọn ohun-èlò

1

Àwọn irinṣẹ́ tó nílò

4

CC0 Àgbègbè Gbogbogbò

Blueprint yìí ti jáde lábẹ́ CC0. O lè ṣe àdàkọ, yí padà, pín, àti lò láìsí ìyọ̀ǹda.

Ṣàtìlẹ́yìn Olùṣẹ́dá nípa rírà àwọn ọjà nipasẹ̀ Blueprint wọn Ẹ̀san Olùṣẹ́dá tí àwọn Olùtajà gbé kalẹ̀, tàbí ṣẹ̀dá àtúnṣe tuntun ti Blueprint yìí kí o sì fi sínú Blueprint rẹ gẹ́gẹ́ bí ìsopọ̀ láti pín owó-wíwọlé.

Ìfọ̀rọ̀wérọ̀

(0)

Wọlé láti dara pọ̀ mọ́ ìfọ̀rọ̀wérọ̀

Ń gbé àwọn ọ̀rọ̀ wọlé...